Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Jund Delirium | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Oculus | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Rakdos Reanimator | koskadelli | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | manohito | 6-3 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901 |
| Jeskai Oculus | sixmp | 6-3 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | thief_of_crowns | 6-3 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Big Red , Boros Burn , Boros Discover , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission , Grixis Bounce , Grixis Demons , Grixis Midrange , Grixis Reanimator
Meta Performance Analysis
Fear of Missing Out ranks #154 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 38%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 62.1%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fear of Missing Out is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 21.21 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Fear of Missing Out has a win rate of 75.3%, making it 0.8% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winternight Stories | Sorcery | 45 | 75.3% | 18 |
| Tersa Lightshatter | Legendary Creature — Orc Wizard | 59 | 74.2% | 23 |
| Glacial Dragonhunt | Sorcery | 46 | 73.6% | 18 |
| Piggy Bank | Artifact Creature — Boar Toy | 8 | 72.2% | 3 |
| No More Lies | Instant | 70 | 65.2% | 22 |
| Unsummon | Instant | 39 | 62.5% | 13 |
| Chart a Course | Sorcery | 50 | 62.3% | 15 |
| Phyrexian Dragon Engine | Artifact Creature — Phyrexian Dragon | 46 | 61.1% | 18 |
| Sheltered by Ghosts | Enchantment — Aura | 202 | 61.0% | 72 |
| Valgavoth's Faithful | Creature — Human Cleric | 20 | 60.8% | 7 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Fear of Missing Out than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overlord of the Balemurk | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 11 | 83.6% | 75.7% | +7.9% |
| Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 12 | 81.8% | 74.5% | +7.4% |
| Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 3 | 12 | 80.6% | 73.9% | +6.7% |
| Atraxa, Grand Unifier | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Angel | 7 | 11 | 83.6% | 77.0% | +6.5% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 10 | 79.7% | 74.6% | +5.1% |
| Duress | Sorcery | 1 | 13 | 79.0% | 74.6% | +4.4% |
| Valgavoth's Faithful | Creature — Human Cleric | 1 | 11 | 83.6% | 79.4% | +4.1% |
| Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 10 | 78.0% | 74.1% | +3.9% |
| Valgavoth, Terror Eater | Legendary Creature — Elder Demon | 9 | 11 | 83.6% | 80.7% | +2.9% |
| Zombify | Sorcery | 4 | 11 | 83.6% | 80.7% | +2.9% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | 293 | 100.0% | 53.0% |
| Gruul Delirium | 151 | 100.0% | 39.6% |
| Rakdos Sacrifice | 49 | 63.6% | 46.8% |
| Rakdos Reanimator | 29 | 76.3% | 52.8% |
| Unknown Archetype | 28 | 7.7% | 44.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.